Eight Polyamide and three Polyester filaments were tested with the goal of comparing the mechanical performance of these two groups of materials. Testing was done in sets beginning with tensile testing, creep testing, impact testing, and ending with layer adhesion testing. Poor performing filaments from earlier tests were eliminated in later testing.
Polymaker PLA Pro was included in most of the tests as a reference point to compare the other filaments to.
The results show that Polyester based filaments can be a good alternative to Polyamides, solving the poor stiffness and creep issues of the latter. However, some of the Polyamides performed better than others and may be better than the Polyesters in terms of durability.
File | Extension |
---|---|
hoffman.pdf |
Version: 1.0.0 latest
initial upload
Eight Polyamide and three Polyester filaments were tested with the goal of comparing the mechanical performance of these two groups of materials. Testing was done in sets beginning with tensile testing, creep testing, impact testing, and ending with layer adhesion testing. Poor performing filaments from earlier tests were eliminated in later testing.
Polymaker PLA Pro was included in most of the tests as a reference point to compare the other filaments to.
The results show that Polyester based filaments can be a good alternative to Polyamides, solving the poor stiffness and creep issues of the latter. However, some of the Polyamides performed better than others and may be better than the Polyesters in terms of durability.
876
279
Aug 22, 2024
United States
English
No license
File | Extension |
---|---|
hoffman.pdf |
Version: 1.0.0 latest
initial upload
The files shown on this site are only available to U.S. Persons, as defined at 22 C.F.R. 120.15. The files are also not available to persons outside the United States or to residents of and persons in the State of New Jersey, with the exception of Federal Firearms Licensees.